Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset)
Alex Bligh
alex at alex.org.uk
Mon Sep 24 12:58:36 UTC 2001
--On Monday, September 24, 2001 7:19 AM -0400 Sean Donelan
<sean at donelan.com> wrote:
> The loss of something like 60 Hudson shouldn't cause more than
> an annoying route flap in your network.
My point being that building a network which doesn't have more
than an annoying route flap, if /both/ 60 Hudson and 111 8th
avenue are lost, is extremely hard (*) (especially if it has
a transatlantic component). And that's true even if you
have your own fiber.
(*) hard means that it isn't compatible with existing topologies,
and building new ones is expensive.
Alex Bligh
Personal Capacity.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list