Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset)

Alex Bligh alex at alex.org.uk
Mon Sep 24 12:58:36 UTC 2001




--On Monday, September 24, 2001 7:19 AM -0400 Sean Donelan 
<sean at donelan.com> wrote:

> The loss of something like 60 Hudson shouldn't cause more than
> an annoying route flap in your network.

My point being that building a network which doesn't have more
than an annoying route flap, if /both/ 60 Hudson and 111 8th
avenue are lost, is extremely hard (*) (especially if it has
a transatlantic component). And that's true even if you
have your own fiber.

(*) hard means that it isn't compatible with existing topologies,
and building new ones is expensive.

Alex Bligh
Personal Capacity.



More information about the NANOG mailing list