Tri-GigE or OC-48 For Milwaukee > Chicago Network

Sat Sep 22 04:07:28 UTC 2001

 You already asked these questions in another fora and received your 
 answers there. Please resist the cycle of multiple crosspostings.

> 
> 
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_0065_01C142ED.9D61F6D0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> 	charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> Dear List:
> 
> We are going to be offering 10/100/1000Mbps Ethernet Services to =
> Milwaukee, WI. We are also opening a 15,000 Sq. Foot Carrier-Neutral =
> Collocation Facility. In order to connect our clients to the public =
> peering exchanges in Chicago do you think we should install multiple =
> Cisco 12,000 series routers in multiple POPs in Downtown Chicago, and =
> then transport all of the data back to the Milwaukee Datacenter via =
> Gigabit Ethernet lines (and then connect those gigabit Ethernet lines =
> into Cisco Switches at the Milwaukee Datacenter) or bring the data back =
> on one redundant OC-48 and have a router in Milwaukee to break up the =
> OC-48?
> 
> Also, Juniper or Cisco for this situation? What would you go with?
> ----------------------
> Nick Catalano
> Chief Strategy Officer
> Nozone, Inc
> 
> Services from the next generation - Nozone, Inc
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_0065_01C142ED.9D61F6D0
> Content-Type: text/html;
> 	charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Dear List:</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>We are going to be offering 10/100/1000Mbps Ethernet =
> Services=20
> to Milwaukee, WI. We are also opening a 15,000 Sq. Foot Carrier-Neutral=20
> Collocation Facility. In order to connect our clients to the public =
> peering=20
> exchanges in Chicago do you think we should install multiple Cisco =
> 12,000 series=20
> routers in multiple POPs in Downtown Chicago, and then transport all of =
> the data=20
> back to the Milwaukee Datacenter via Gigabit Ethernet lines (and then =
> connect=20
> those gigabit Ethernet lines into Cisco Switches at the Milwaukee =
> Datacenter) or=20
> bring the data back on one redundant OC-48 and have a router in =
> Milwaukee to=20
> break up the OC-48?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Also, Juniper or Cisco for this situation? What =
> would you go=20
> with?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>----------------------<BR>Nick Catalano<BR>Chief =
> Strategy=20
> Officer<BR>Nozone, Inc</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Services from the next generation - Nozone,=20
> Inc</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_0065_01C142ED.9D61F6D0--
> 