Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...

Mon Sep 10 20:28:10 UTC 2001

On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:46:48 BST, Alex Bligh said:

> Oh so true, and of far wider applicability than the subject at
> hand. If this mailing list had a FAQ, this should be the answer
> to most of the questions.

Q1: What are the common flame wars on NANOG?
A1: RFC1918, ORBS/MAPS, ARIN, PI /28s, DSL for business use.

Q2: What are some proper ways to configure/run a network? For instance,
should I use RFC1910 space to number my routers?
A2: See Q1.
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Operating Systems Analyst
				Virginia Tech

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20010910/c92e8a71/attachment.sig>