end2end? (was: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...)

steve uurtamo uurtamo at arttoday.com
Sat Sep 8 00:37:34 UTC 2001


> 	And can I persuade the judge that since NATs are known to
> 	muck about w/ addresses & such that I can construct a case
> 	that what was received did not come from me. So the porn
> 	came from one of the NAT operators.

similarly, the anonymous remail operator sends all outbound mail, eh?
i dunno.

s.



More information about the NANOG mailing list