Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...

Fri Sep 7 04:55:16 UTC 2001

|> From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:spork at inch.com]
|> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:16 PM

|> On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:

|> > To be honest, even though I've used NAT myself and have 
|> implemented NAT for
|> > friends and clients, I would NEVER represent that a NAT'd 
|> address has the
|> > full connectivity to the Internet that a static address does.
|> 
|> True...  neither does a well-firewalled LAN.

There is a substantial difference between broken access and controlled
access.