BGP noise tonight? (fwd)

Tue Oct 9 18:55:04 UTC 2001

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

We have found our stick was effective with our vendor, given enough
beatings.

Regards,
Matt
- --
Matt Levine
@Home: matt at deliver3.com
@Work: matt at eldosales.com
ICQ  : 17080004
PGP  : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0D04CF 
"The Trouble with doing anything right the first time is that nobody
appreciates how difficult it was." 

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu]On Behalf
Of
Randy Bush
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:47 AM
To: Sean Donelan
Cc: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd)

> I agree, it is only one step on a long road.  But you have to take
> the first step, if nothing else, so when a "new" vendor releases a
> product it won't include the old behavior.  Or at least, an
> officially revised RFC gives customers another stick to beat their
> vendor.

but we have the stick now.  unfortunately, we also have a vendor who
ignores sticks.  so adding different or more sticks may not be the
way to go.

randy

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBO8NHrcp0j1NsDQTPEQJLDwCfQBus6S0ZrGFM77NnpyzbxrmBuHQAoMnx
Fu0t89wOWFNODHlgDo2vi4fA
=Mqmb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----