BGP noise tonight? (fwd)
abha
ahuja at wibh.net
Mon Oct 8 23:41:47 UTC 2001
Did a lot of folks get affected by this? Any news on what caused the
bogus path?
Anyone have contacts at 2008?
(transit ASes deleted) ?3?64603? 2008
-abha ;)
(an inquiring mind who wants to know... *grin*)
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Christopher A. Woodfield wrote:
>
> All prefixes originating from AS2008 dissapeared from our feeds at
> approx. 9:30pm EDT. About an hour later, I noticed that the prefixes were
> back, but no longer carrying the malformed path.
>
> -Chris
>
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 12:52:18AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> >
> > > So who do you blame...the RFC or the vendor that ignores it? Dropping the
> > > session seems to break the "be conservative in what you send and liberal
> > > in what you accept" suggestion. If you know someone else will ignore the
> > > rules (there's always someone) breaking due to their error kind of sucks.
> >
> > is there a proof of termination of this path?
>
> --
> ---------------------------
> Christopher A. Woodfield rekoil at semihuman.com
>
> PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list