Verio Peering Question

E.B. Dreger eddy+public+spam at noc.everquick.net
Wed Oct 3 02:12:15 UTC 2001


> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 23:48:55 +0100
> From: Alex Bligh <alex at alex.org.uk>

[ snip ]

> Aside: It's interesting that all the anti-filtering arguments
> are coming from those who are customers of Filterer's peers. We

[ snip ]

Perhaps those who disagree with this type of filtering avoid the
upstreams in question?

If customer of Filterer understands what's happening, and doesn't
mind losing redundant paths to smaller networks, _that's_ what I
want to hear.  AFAIK, that hasn't been posted, either.


Eddy

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist at brics.com>
To: blacklist at brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.  Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist at brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.




More information about the NANOG mailing list