214/8 and 215/8
Joe Provo
joe.provo at rcn.com
Thu Nov 1 14:51:53 UTC 2001
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 11:44:50AM +1000, Philip Smith wrote:
> I seem to remember that they were exchanged for 49/8 and 50/8. Seems a
> bit odd that this was done, and I'd love to know what the technical or
> operational or political advantage was. Maybe the IANA folks can shed
> more light?
Obvious immediate advantage: bypass A-space filters. They probably also
have swampy /24s that need visibility as such but couldn't be renumbered
until after having non-A-space.
--
Joe Provo Voice 508.486.7471
Director, Internet Planning & Design Fax 508.229.2375
Network Deployment & Management, RCN <joe.provo at rcn.com>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list