214/8 and 215/8

Chrisy Luke chrisy at flix.net
Thu Nov 1 03:08:32 UTC 2001


Philip Smith wrote (on Nov 01):
> I seem to remember that they were exchanged for 49/8 and 50/8. Seems a bit 
> odd that this was done, and I'd love to know what the technical or 
> operational or political advantage was. Maybe the IANA folks can shed more 
> light?

OT: Perhaps the military hasn't come across the "ip classless" (or
equivalent for other antiquated vendors) directive?

Chris.
-- 
== chris at easynet.net                                    T: +44 845 333 0122
== Global IP Network Engineering, Easynet Group PLC     F: +44 845 333 0122



More information about the NANOG mailing list