214/8 and 215/8
Chrisy Luke
chrisy at flix.net
Thu Nov 1 03:08:32 UTC 2001
Philip Smith wrote (on Nov 01):
> I seem to remember that they were exchanged for 49/8 and 50/8. Seems a bit
> odd that this was done, and I'd love to know what the technical or
> operational or political advantage was. Maybe the IANA folks can shed more
> light?
OT: Perhaps the military hasn't come across the "ip classless" (or
equivalent for other antiquated vendors) directive?
Chris.
--
== chris at easynet.net T: +44 845 333 0122
== Global IP Network Engineering, Easynet Group PLC F: +44 845 333 0122
More information about the NANOG
mailing list