214/8 and 215/8
Philip Smith
pfs at cisco.com
Thu Nov 1 01:44:50 UTC 2001
I seem to remember that they were exchanged for 49/8 and 50/8. Seems a bit
odd that this was done, and I'd love to know what the technical or
operational or political advantage was. Maybe the IANA folks can shed more
light?
From http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space:
049/8 Joint Technical Command May 94
Returned to IANA Mar 98
050/8 Joint Technical Command May 94
Returned to IANA Mar 98
...
214/8 US-DOD Mar 98
215/8 US-DOD Mar 98
philip
--
At 14:15 31/10/2001 -0800, Sean M. Doran wrote:
>Hi -
>
> 214/8 and 215/8 seem to have been allocated to the U.S. DoD in ca. 1998.
>There does seem to be a few sizeable announcements (which overlap a few
>not-so-sizable ones), but I have to wonder if anyone can explain the
>grounds on which they were allocated these two /8s, and which body
>did the allocation. Anyone?
>
> Sean.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list