Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth
web at typo.org
Tue May 29 20:09:20 UTC 2001
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 03:39:40PM -0400, Nathan Stratton wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2001, Pete Kruckenberg wrote:
> > A 1536-byte frame has a fairly significant impact (~8ms) at
> > 1.5Mb/s. QoS appears to have diminishing return as you move
> > beyond 45Mbps, at least as far as multi-service networks go.
> > Maybe QoS isn't necessary or useful in the core if you have
> > line-speed switching and no congestion on an OC-X/DWDM
> > network.
> It has even a larger impact on a 128K frac T1 (~93ms). QoS is a big help,
> but at slower speeds you also need to deal with fragmentation and the
> layer 2 transport. I am surprised that there has been so little movement
> as far as QoS and efficiency in regards to VoIP. Take a standard voice call
> using G.726 at 32 kbps, you get 40 bytes of voice every 10 ms. Now add on
> your 20 byte IP header, 8 bytes UDP, and 12 byte RTP header. So now we are
> at 80 bytes and most of the time we are shoving this on ATM so our 32K
> voice stream now sucks 84.8 kbps.
> If you are interested in more info on QoS and Voice/Data over last mine
> networks check out my website:
Adding control through layering has been something of a pet peeve of
mine for quite a while (especially when ATM is involved in the mix and
now with MPLS, it just gets a tad worse). As Nathan has demonstrated,
usually added overhead just means added headaches. It seems to me that
there ought to be better ways to go about this whole thing.
More information about the NANOG