NANOG Digest V1 #737

Tue May 29 19:07:56 UTC 2001

Happened here too.  A quick check showed that according to Majordomo, we
weren't subscribed.  Must have been a glitch.

On Tue, 29 May 2001, Kai Schlichting wrote:

> 
> Hmm, is this just me, or did someone else start receiving the
> digest version this morning,too - without any action on his/her own?
> Simultaneously, I receive the regular (non-digest) list mail
> as well. Both come from the same host (trapdoor.merit.edu).
> 
> 
> > Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (postfix at trapdoor.merit.edu [198.108.1.26])
> >         by conti.nu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA06067
> >         for <kai at pac-rim.net>; Tue, 29 May 2001 06:35:35 -0400 (EDT)
> > Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 06:35:35 -0400 (EDT)
> > Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix)
> >         id 227A291218; Tue, 29 May 2001 06:28:57 -0400 (EDT)
> > Delivered-To: nanog-digest-outgoing at trapdoor.merit.edu
> > Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56)
> >         id B735C91217; Tue, 29 May 2001 06:28:56 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: owner-nanog-digest at trapdoor.merit.edu (NANOG Digest)
> > To: nanog-digest at trapdoor.merit.edu
> > Subject: NANOG Digest V1 #737
> > Reply-To: 
> > Sender: owner-nanog-digest at trapdoor.merit.edu
> > Errors-To: owner-nanog-digest at trapdoor.merit.edu
> > Precedence: bulk
> > Message-Id: <20010529102856.B735C91217 at trapdoor.merit.edu>
> > Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 06:28:56 -0400 (EDT)
> > X-UIDL: 913bee7d2f58a5cea4042a463d2a49f6
> 
> 

---
John Fraizer
EnterZone, Inc