last mile capacity
RJ Atkinson
rja at inet.org
Tue May 29 17:50:47 UTC 2001
At 11:38 29/05/01, Sean M. Doran wrote:
>Irwin Lazar <ILazar at tbg.com> writes
>
>| In our
>| area, we're also seeing a lot of pushback against the continued tearing up
>| of streets to lay additional fiber, so QoS may become the only option to
>| meet required service levels.
>
>The correct way of solving this was demonstrated in Stockholm
>and duplicated in a handful of Canadian cities. In the first case,
>the City of Stockholm "nationalized" the laying down of dark fibre
>in the city, and formed an agency (http://www.stokab.se/english/) which
>provides unlit/unrepeated/unamplified dark fibre between any pair
>of addresses in Stockholm at cost as a public utility.
At least some US cities are following the lead of Stockholm.
Palo Alto, CA is one example. Others exist. The common thread
seems to be city-owned/operated monopolies for water/electricity/etc
-- so they can reduce install cost by just laying fibre whenever
they are already trenching for electricity/water/etc maintenance.
Ran
rja at inet.org
More information about the NANOG
mailing list