Frame-relay outage: Nolo Contendere
Jeff Mcadams
jeffm at iglou.com
Tue May 29 17:39:27 UTC 2001
(Not sure if your email address is spam-trapped or not)
Also sprach E.B. Dreger
>I recently read a tariff filing by SWBT that did something similar.
>I'd have to dig up the filing for the exact wording, but it was
>something to the effect of "we're just doing this because we're nice,
>not because we think it applies." Yeah, right.
>Is this "we don't agree with the PUC, but we're just doing it because
>we're so nice" thing something that SBC does now?
BellSouth is certainly trying that line with the Kentucky PSC in our
case regarding their DSL tariff. That issue may end up coming to a head
pretty soon now...should be interesting to watch.
Case number 1999-484 at the KY PSC, http://www.psc.state.ky.us. Not all
filings are available online with the case, but recent (past 4 months)
rulings from the PSC are.
Seriously though...anyone interested in DSL deployment issues is
encouraged to check this case out.
--
Jeff McAdams Email: jeffm at iglou.com
Head Network Administrator Voice: (502) 966-3848
IgLou Internet Services (800) 436-4456
More information about the NANOG
mailing list