QOS or more bandwidth
ILazar at tbg.com
Tue May 29 14:51:16 UTC 2001
> FWIW, I recently heard someone ask the question - "how do you go to your
> investors and tell them you need more money for more bandwidth because you
> don't want to efficiently manage your existing capacity?"
> This is the business case for QoS, IMHO.
Which costs more, wholesale, raw bitpipes or qualified
engineering talent to create/police the policies needed
to maintain QoS?
That's the $64k question. :-)
>From what I've seen, there isn't a simple answer. In places where bandwidth
is exorbantantly expensive (such as outside the United States), simply over
provisioning isn't an acceptable answer. However, in some places in the
U.S. & Europe, over-provisioning may certainly make more sense. In our
area, we're also seeing a lot of pushback against the continued tearing up
of streets to lay additional fiber, so QoS may become the only option to
meet required service levels.
More information about the NANOG