Mitch tries to defend his open relay again (was Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning))

Tue May 29 10:28:42 UTC 2001

On Tue, 29 May 2001, Mitch Halmu wrote:

> I responded to Wilcox and Fraizer in private. Their bashful posts serve 
> to illustrate exactly why such people cannot dictate policy to others.

Mitch,

If you desire to reply to me in private, might I suggest that you do it from a mailserver that isn't listed in MAPS...

May 28 18:19:11 Overkill sendmail[8797]: f4SMJBu08797: ruleset=check_rcpt, arg1=<nanog at Overkill.EnterZone.Net>, relay=[205.159
.140.2], reject=553 5.3.0 <nanog at Overkill.EnterZone.Net>... Open spam relay - see http://www.mail-abuse.org/rss/
May 28 18:19:12 Overkill sendmail[8797]: f4SMJBu08797: from=<mitch at netside.net>, size=6370, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, da
emon=MTA, relay=[205.159.140.2]

May 29 05:33:39 Overkill sendmail[26337]: f4T9Xcu26337: ruleset=check_rcpt, arg1=<nanog at Overkill.EnterZone.Net>, relay=[205.15
9.140.2], reject=553 5.3.0 <nanog at Overkill.EnterZone.Net>... Open spam relay - see http://www.mail-abuse.org/rss/
May 29 05:33:39 Overkill sendmail[26337]: f4T9Xcu26337: from=<mitch at netside.net>, size=1439, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, d
aemon=MTA, relay=[205.159.140.2]

---
John Fraizer
EnterZone, Inc