EMAIL != FTP
alex at relcom.EU.net
Fri May 25 17:10:03 UTC 2001
> > But for a little extra SMTP handshaking at the start, there is no
> > efficiency
> > difference in transfer rate between SMTP and FTP. Probably the same is
> > true for HTTP though I've not looked.
> I think you missed the fact that sending files via SMTP is incredibly
> inefficient. Any files sent via SMTP have to be encoded which can balloon
> the transmission up 30%+. That is an incredible waste of bandwidth on a
After all, nmodep compress it back to the original size while transferring. The
rate loss is 5 - 10%, not 30 - 40.
For LAN, this volumes are not large (1 - 2 Mb).
> 10MB file. Also, remember that SMTP usually relays, so the message is
> bounced between 1-8 servers along the way (or more), more bandwidth and
> resources wasted. *sigh*
> Robert Blayzor IP Network Engineer, BOFH BiznessOnline.com, Inc.
> rblayzor at thebiz.net noc at thebiz.net http://www.thebiz.net/
> FreeBSD, Putting the 'Operating' back into OS! -- http://www.freebsd.org/
More information about the NANOG