rmeyer at mhsc.com
Fri May 25 16:05:53 UTC 2001
The original message never made that distinction.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn McMahon [mailto:smcmahon at eiv.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 4:30 AM
> To: nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Stealth Blocking
> On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:04:34PM -0400, Jason Slagle wrote:
> > And, as a business we wouldn't divert you. This is only a
> solution for
> > Resi accounts.
> You do realize, I assume, that if somebody thinks he's sending email
> directly to a certain server, and you divert it to another server,
> you're intercepting it under the terms of the Electronic
> Privacy Act of 1986?
> That's allowed if it's necessary to provide the service, but good luck
> winning on that argument with the plaintiffs trotting out
> witnesses stating
> it's not necessary, just your choice.
More information about the NANOG