Stealth Blocking

Fri May 25 11:29:50 UTC 2001

On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:04:34PM -0400, Jason Slagle wrote:
> 
> And, as a business we wouldn't divert you.  This is only a solution for
> Resi accounts.

You do realize, I assume, that if somebody thinks he's sending email
directly to a certain server, and you divert it to another server,
you're intercepting it under the terms of the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act of 1986?

That's allowed if it's necessary to provide the service, but good luck
winning on that argument with the plaintiffs trotting out witnesses stating
it's not necessary, just your choice.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20010525/96131c2a/attachment.sig>