Stability of the Internet?
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Wed May 23 17:57:40 UTC 2001
> > > business and in into the PSO business it is now chartered for.
> >
> > True. And it should also get out of the operations biz,
> > but that is another kettle of fish.
>
> The problem there is that there is no place for operations discussions,
> AFAICT. This may be an oversight on part of the ICANN conceptual framework.
> Most of the rest of us assumed (yeah, I know) that the IETF would handle
> that. Agreed, this may be in error. But, it is an error without a solution.
Protocols are not Operations.
Operations fourms exist independent of IETF.
(see the various *NOG's, EOF-LIST, APOP, et.al.)
Protocol developers & Policy makers should listen
to Operators.
To subsume operations in the IETF is just as bad as
subsuming policy in the IETF.
--bill
More information about the NANOG
mailing list