A question on CE to PE route exchanges ...

Dave Israel davei at biohazard.demon.digex.net
Tue May 22 17:49:30 UTC 2001

On 5/21/2001 at 14:18:15 -0700, Robert Raszuk said:
> > not be interested.  The issue here is that Cisco will tend to
> > add IGP routes to the default table, not the VPN table.  Bad
> > things ensue.
> What ... ? For protocols that have been vrf aware routes go into vrfs
> and not global RIB. 

That's the problem:  not all the IGP's (specifically, not ours) are
aware, and handling for a non-aware IGP on a VRF interface is 
more dangerous than one might expect.


More information about the NANOG mailing list