black hat .cn networks

Rowland, Alan D alan_r1 at corp.earthlink.net
Tue May 8 17:18:41 UTC 2001


Haven't seen it brought up yet but since hacking is alleged to be a capital
crime in China perhaps the non-response is the self-protection gene kicking
in. :O

Just my 2¢.

-Al

-----Original Message-----
From: David Lesher [mailto:wb8foz at nrk.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 7:12 AM
To: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Re: black hat .cn networks



Unnamed Administration sources reported that Paul Lantinga said:
> 
> 
> Why not decide on a workable message and have it translated by a competent
> Chinese translator first?  

I'm sorry, but from my admittedly limited experience in that part
of the world, I find it hard to believe messages are discarded
unread for that reason.

Too many people there read and speak English, especially those
educated enough to be sysadms. They may not do so well enough
to anchor the BBC World Service broadcast, but...

I welcome enlightenment on this from people with more direct
knowledge.

-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz at nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433




More information about the NANOG mailing list