black hat .cn networks

neil d. quiogue quioguen at hk.psi.net
Tue May 8 10:29:09 UTC 2001


Well there may be a myriad of reasons on why the admins of those ISPs do not
respond:
1. abuse/postmaster goes to some mailbox no one reads like root which
contains a bunch of other messages.
2. Language issue has been mentioned and it's a valid one.  I don't think
many admins are aware of those translators.
3. They don't know how to handle such cases.
4. They don't care?

I don't think the encoding matters much since one is sending from a
non-Big5/SJIS encoding to Big5/SJIS encoding and those that support
Big5/SJIS support the other encodings.  The other way around might be a
problem though.

But the nonresponse is a valid concern.  I wonder if I'll be censored soon.
:-)

Regards,

Neil D. Quiogue
PSINet Hong Kong Ltd.

"Information and attachments herein are intended for the named recipients
only.  It may contain attorney-client privileged or confidential matter.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately, and destroy the original message.  Do not disclose the
contents to anyone.  Thank you."

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Hollis" <goemon at anime.net>
To: "Wing Wong" <dualwing at pacbell.net>
Cc: <nanog at merit.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:50 PM
Subject: RE: black hat .cn networks


>
> On Tue, 8 May 2001, Wing Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 May 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > > On Tue, 8 May 2001, Paul Lantinga wrote:
> > > > Justin, et al, do you have any *proof* that these attacks are coming
from
> > > > Chinese attackers on Chinese machines?
> > > We may never know since mainland china admins never respond to abuse
mails.
> > Ever consider the possibility that the admins in question don't
understand
> > English? It'd be like if someone sends you a Big5 or SJIS encoded
message
> > complaining about spam or cracks and all you see is binary jiberish on
> > your screen.
> > Even romanized communications would be difficult to understand.
>
> I can use babelfish, why can't they?
>
> Yes, babelfish is less than perfect, but I can usually grok the gist of an
> email.
>
> And if babelfish isnt good enough, there's others.
>
> FWIW I've had a chinese friend in canada send a BIG5 email once and the
> same -- no response.
>
> -Dan
>
>





More information about the NANOG mailing list