HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US]
jeffm at iglou.com
Mon May 7 21:50:40 UTC 2001
Also sprach Fletcher E Kittredge
>If you can't tell the legal difference between the above cases, I
>recommend you stay out of this discussion.
The legal arguement comes down to. The cablecos are a monopoly, period.
They are abusing their monopoly position to leverage their way into a
new market (as an ISP), period. That's a clear violation of
Clayton/Shermen, period. The only way that the legal differences apply
is if there is regulatory oversight, then the regulations are supposed
to prevent these abuses. Without the regulatory oversight (which most
of us agree are weak or non-existent), it becomes a clear
Regardless...this has little or nothing to do with H.R. 1542, which is
still a crappy bill and needs to be smacked back down the Bayou where it
can get eaten by a croc (not that I'd wish that on the croc!).
Fortunately, Reps. Cannon and Conyers seem to have a clue. Support
Jeff McAdams Email: jeffm at iglou.com
Head Network Administrator Voice: (502) 966-3848
IgLou Internet Services (800) 436-4456
More information about the NANOG