Statements against new.net?

Stephen Stuart stuart at mfnx.net
Thu Mar 15 16:53:08 UTC 2001


> IIRC, there was an "issue" around the assignment of 16.1.16.1; I don't
> think lawyers had been invented back then, so the scope of the scandal
> remained relatively small.
> 
> (The coolness factor was the binary representation, of course.)

Sorry, it was the hex representation, of course.

Stephen




More information about the NANOG mailing list