Statements against new.net?

Wed Mar 14 12:50:02 UTC 2001

Hi Hank

 In this particular case ".XXX" as "generic" suffix is probably not a good
choice - I'm sure someone would pay a lot of money for this particular
gTLD ...

Regards
	Rafi

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Hank Nussbacher wrote:

>
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2001 Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
>
> > I fail to see how RFC2826 is in any way "political".Upon careful re-reading
> > it boils down to:
> >
> > If you use one root, everybody agrees what things look like.
> >
> > If you use multiple roots, what people will see depends on which root they ask.
> >
> > How is this political?
>
> It isn't, but since these cyber-carpetbaggers have failed on the technical
> end to get their way, they figure if they can turn it into a political
> issue then they can involve their clueless congressman to jump in and make
> all sorts of investigations and subcommittees and perhaps they will end up
> with the pseudo-jackpot of a .xxx suffix in their hands.
>
> -Hank
>
>
>
>