The Cidr Report
Simon Leinen
simon at limmat.switch.ch
Sat Mar 3 12:21:19 UTC 2001
>>>>> "tb" == Tony Bates <tbates at cisco.com> writes:
[...]
> 1) Gains by aggregating at the origin AS level
>
> --- 02Mar01 ---
> ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description
It might be interesting to look at an alternative ordering of this, so
that the relative rather than the absolute benefit of proper
aggregation is highlighted (but we still want a lower threshold for
the absolute benefit). This makes those cases stand out that are
smaller but may be easiest to fix. So this is Tony's list piped
through "sort -k 4 -n -r | head" (or something):
AS11170 64 1 63 98.4% Bewell Net
AS13999 109 7 102 93.6% Mega Cable S.A. de C.V.
AS16758 63 6 57 90.5% IKON Office Solutions
AS8006 145 19 126 86.9% Systems & Software Consortium, In
AS6413 67 11 56 83.6% Southern Online Systems, Inc.
AS9498 87 20 67 77.0% BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD.
AS9269 161 52 109 67.7% Internet service Provider in Hong
AS5106 101 37 64 63.4% Ameritech Advanced Data Services,
AS7545 190 70 120 63.2% TPG Internet Pty Ltd
AS6595 165 63 102 61.8% DoD Education Activity Network As
Know anybody at one of these?
--
Simon.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list