The Cidr Report

Simon Leinen simon at limmat.switch.ch
Sat Mar 3 12:21:19 UTC 2001


>>>>> "tb" == Tony Bates <tbates at cisco.com> writes:
[...]
> 1) Gains by aggregating at the origin AS level
> 
>  --- 02Mar01 ---
> ASnum    NetsNow NetsCIDR  NetGain  % Gain   Description

It might be interesting to look at an alternative ordering of this, so
that the relative rather than the absolute benefit of proper
aggregation is highlighted (but we still want a lower threshold for
the absolute benefit).  This makes those cases stand out that are
smaller but may be easiest to fix.  So this is Tony's list piped
through "sort -k 4 -n -r | head" (or something):

AS11170       64        1       63   98.4%   Bewell Net 
AS13999      109        7      102   93.6%   Mega Cable S.A. de C.V. 
AS16758       63        6       57   90.5%   IKON Office Solutions 
AS8006       145       19      126   86.9%   Systems & Software Consortium, In
AS6413        67       11       56   83.6%   Southern Online Systems, Inc. 
AS9498        87       20       67   77.0%   BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD.
AS9269       161       52      109   67.7%   Internet service Provider in Hong
AS5106       101       37       64   63.4%   Ameritech Advanced Data Services,
AS7545       190       70      120   63.2%   TPG Internet Pty Ltd
AS6595       165       63      102   61.8%   DoD Education Activity Network As

Know anybody at one of these?
-- 
Simon.




More information about the NANOG mailing list