peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecdotes)
Paul Vixie
vixie at mfnx.net
Tue Jun 26 17:43:31 UTC 2001
Following up on my own post:
vixie at mfnx.net (Paul Vixie) writes:
> Recommendation: upgrade your peering requirements to include language like:
> ...
Several folks here talked about technical implementation aspects (RPF, etc)
and a few told me privately that peering was a sales/marketing activity at
this stage of the game.
This either means that upgrading the general level of peering agreement is
not possible, or that the people I should be discussing it with don't read
NANOG.
This echos what I learnt at Stephen's BOF in Phoenix.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list