Global BGP - 2001-06-23

Mon Jun 25 21:46:49 UTC 2001

On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 02:38:32PM -0700, lucifer at lightbearer.com wrote:
> Can anyone verify whether Cisco still does BGP this way? (Propagate, then
> kill origionating session). If so, it rather clearly answers the question
> about how this managed to make it throughout the network...

	I'm fairly sure that is not the case anymore.

> (For the record: I'm not trying to Cisco-bash here. All vendors have
> problems, and when you have a huge market share, your problems tend to
> show up much more obviously, when they appear. However, Cisco does still
> have a huge market share, meaning this affected a whole lot of people,
> if true... so, I'm curious).

	From what I can tell this time it was not ciscos fault.  It
appears that the vendor that had the problem just had an issue with
a specific "valid" announcement that others propogated to it.

	What is interesting is one could use this to see what
providers are using vendor "X" at exchange points.

	- Jared

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.