BGP instability (was Re: Exodus Down)

Sun Jun 24 05:06:50 UTC 2001

> >         3.  The information received via the list is considered
> >         confidential information, not to be reproduced in any form
> >         without prior written approval of Exodus.
>
> I hate to argue on NANOG about this, but #3 seems to me like it's an NDA
> (although a rather informal one), for all intents and purposes.
>
> In any case, #3 would be violated by posting NANOG about any information on
> that list, IMHO.

Can you really enforce a unilateral NDA assertion?

I donut think so. It'd be an interesting fight.