Multicast Traffic on Backbones
David Charlap
david.charlap at marconi.com
Fri Jun 15 23:26:52 UTC 2001
David Schwartz wrote:
> John Olp wrote:
>>
>> The argument that multicast should be billed based on the number of
>> receivers is flawed. Those receivers are already being billed
>> based on the bandwidth they use regardless of source.
>
> They are billed by their ISP for the traffic they receive. This
> doesn't cover the cost of sending the data to them on the sourcing
> ISP. This is why you pay for both traffic you send and for traffic
> you receive. Both cost your provider money to do for you.
Nice bit of double-billing.
One packet traverses the network, and two people pay for it.
-- David
More information about the NANOG
mailing list