Opinions about InterNAP

Thu Jun 14 17:58:41 UTC 2001

Apparently AboveNet doesn't use the RBL in BGP form anymore.

	-ajb
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 02:35:08PM -0400, Mitch Halmu wrote:
->
->
->On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Seth M. Kusiak wrote:
->
->> It seems that InterNAP 
->> is perfect in our situation because they buy transit from multiple providers 
->> and claim to not have any black holes in their network. 
->> 
->> I hear many great things about InterNAP and I hear the opposite as well. 
->> 
->> Any thoughts would GREATLY be appreciated 
->
->If indeed they adhere to a "no black holes" policy, they are to be 
->commended. Who would have thought this will become a strong selling
->point? Access to the whole uncensored Internet, available only from 
->a few select providers...
->
->http://www.peacefire.org/stealth/group-statement.5-17-2001.html
->
->--Mitch
->NetSide
---end quoted text---

-- 
Andrew Barros <abarros at tjhsst.edu>
PGP Key Fingerprint:
D3B8 0800 C45A 143E 5CF0  E112 0A1B AB36 B655 1FB8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20010614/7e19bdac/attachment.sig>