What is up with 170.36.0.0/16

Thu Jun 14 15:25:33 UTC 2001

* Christopher A. Woodfield <rekoil at semihuman.com> [20010614 08:04]:
> 
> (Thwaps hand against forehead)
> 
> Oh, you DID lookup the individual IP. never mind.
> 
> /me crawls back into his cubicle.

Well there is more than one MX box for the site he's concerned with...most
in completely different CIDR blocks.  It wouldn't hurt the original poster
to do what you suggested so don't hurt your forehead too badly. :-)

-jr

> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 11:34:04AM -0400, Christopher A. Woodfield wrote:
> > 
> > HAve youtried doing a BGP lookup for the MX's IP, rather than the whole 
> > /16? That will return the smallest aggregate that includes the target 
> > IP(s). It's entirely possible that the block is not in the table as a /16, 
> > but as a set of sub-aggregates.

----
Josh Richards <jrichard@{ geekresearch.com, cubicle.net }> [JTR38/JR539-ARIN]
Geek Research, LLC - San Luis Obispo, CA - <URL:http://www.geekresearch.com/>
KG6CYK - IP/Unix/telecom/knowledge/coffee/security/crypto/business/geek