What is up with 170.36.0.0/16

Christopher A. Woodfield rekoil at semihuman.com
Thu Jun 14 15:34:04 UTC 2001


HAve youtried doing a BGP lookup for the MX's IP, rather than the whole 
/16? That will return the smallest aggregate that includes the target 
IP(s). It's entirely possible that the block is not in the table as a /16, 
but as a set of sub-aggregates.

-Chris

On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 11:28:36AM -0400, Erik Antelman wrote:
> 
> Is someone renumbering around this area?
> My motivation is to understand the mechanisms and techniques \
> by which a non-privelaged user (ie someone without login access to a BGP fed
> router)
> would diagnose (characterize, locate, identify, etc..) failure to reach a
> large corporations
> mail servers (1/2 of the MX servers for fleet.com)
> 
> RADB has nothing on this, a New York QWEST looking glass says:
> Query: bgp
> IP address: 170.36.73.11
> Location: New York
> Timeout: 20 seconds
> 
> % Network not in table
> 
> What's up?
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
---------------------------
Christopher A. Woodfield		rekoil at semihuman.com

PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B



More information about the NANOG mailing list