non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1)
J.D. Falk
jdfalk at cybernothing.org
Tue Jun 12 02:18:53 UTC 2001
On 06/11/01, "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam at noc.everquick.net> wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:16:36 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Travis Pugh <tpugh at shore.net>
> >
> > That sales BS is probably prompted by customers telling sales people
> > that they won't buy service from anyone but a "tier 1" provider. This
> > leads to many creative definitions of tier 1.
>
> So, how firm is the "transit-free" definition? (That's what I always
> thought was the proper definition, but it's been obliterated in the past
> couple of years...) Firm enough to slap abusers with false advertising
> suits? ;-P
Well, for one thing, "transit-free" doesn't mean that you
can route to all the other "transit-free" providers....
--
J.D. Falk SILENCE IS FOO!
<jdfalk at cybernothing.org>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list