non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1)

E.B. Dreger eddy+public+spam at noc.everquick.net
Mon Jun 11 13:14:23 UTC 2001


> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:16:36 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Travis Pugh <tpugh at shore.net>
> 
> That sales BS is probably prompted by customers telling sales people
> that they won't buy service from anyone but a "tier 1" provider.  This
> leads to many creative definitions of tier 1.

So, how firm is the "transit-free" definition?  (That's what I always
thought was the proper definition, but it's been obliterated in the past
couple of years...)  Firm enough to slap abusers with false advertising
suits? ;-P


Eddy

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brotsman & Dreger, Inc.
EverQuick Internet Division

Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist at brics.com>
To: blacklist at brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.  Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist at brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.




More information about the NANOG mailing list