C&W Perring
Scott Patterson
scottp at netrail.net
Wed Jun 6 18:08:04 UTC 2001
MessageI would guess it is PSI. They are trying to see exactly how much
traffic they can force to other networks by pre-pending and probably (I
don't know how their routing is setup) setting lpref on the c&w sessions to
their lowest possible. Then they will know what traffic is only available
through c&w. Then they will prob see how many of these people they can peer
directly with or sell services to during the 60 day continuation.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu]On Behalf Of
David Sinn
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Nanog
Subject: RE: C&W Perring
So which side is doing the pre-pending?
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* 12.10.44.0/23 166.49.26.73 50 100 0 3561 174 174
174 174 4550 11937 i
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Moe Allen [mailto:moe at vidnet.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:33 AM
To: Nanog
Subject: C&W Perring
To all:
I just got off the phone with Cable & Wireless. A 60 day
continuation of peering with PSINET was reached last night. The peering is
back up and we can now find PSINET DNS server again. More on this as I am
made aware.
Respectfully,
Morris Allen
President
VidcomNet, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20010606/f3047c37/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list