C&W Peering

Vivien M. vivienm at dyndns.org
Mon Jun 4 23:58:57 UTC 2001


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher A. Woodfield [mailto:rekoil at semihuman.com]
> Sent: June 4, 2001 7:55 PM
> To: John Starta
> Cc: Vivien M.; Mike Hughes; Sean Donelan; nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: Re: C&W Peering
>
> I don't think that this is going to be solved by C&W reversing
> themselves;
> I think PSI is going to have to get itself some transit, and quickly.

Is this the part where the people (eg: Exodus, AboveNet are the two I can
think of immediately) who were forced to get themselves some transit because
PSI wouldn't peer with them anymore go and laugh at the irony of C&W pulling
a PSI on PSI themselves?

Vivien
--
Vivien M.
vivienm at dyndns.org
Assistant System Administrator
Dynamic DNS Network Services
http://www.dyndns.org/




More information about the NANOG mailing list