C&W Peering
Christopher A. Woodfield
rekoil at semihuman.com
Mon Jun 4 23:55:14 UTC 2001
THE UNITED STATES and Offnet Connectivity
Cable & Wireless chose to terminate connectivity with
PSINet on 2June01. Over 90% of the traffic that used
to be routed through C&W is now being routed via other means
through our robust global free peering infrastructure.
The remaining 10% or so represents C&W customers that have
been deliberately cut off from PSINet by C&W. While PSINet
is ready and willing to re-establish connectivity with
C&W at any time, it is up to C&W to choose to reverse their
previous decision. In the meantime, PSINet can offer
services directly to those C&W customers that are affected.
OK, PSI seems to assert that 90% of C&W networks are still accessable from
PSI customers. NANOG research so far has determined that this is
definitely *not* the case. If anyone has evidence to support PSI's claim,
please post.
Dear PSI: this may not be directly your fault, but dammit, own up to the
scope of the issue. It's in your interest to take advantage of being the
"good guy" for once, so don't ruin it by lying about the scope of the
problem.
I don't think that this is going to be solved by C&W reversing themselves;
I think PSI is going to have to get itself some transit, and quickly.
-C
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 04:18:48PM -0700, John Starta wrote:
>
> See PSINet's network status page (http://www.psi.com/cgi-bin/netstatus.pl5)
> for a possible answer.
>
> jas
>
> At 06:22 PM 6/4/01 -0400, Vivien M. wrote:
> >I suppose now PSI gets to learn the hard way what happens when they scared
> >half their peers away (to be polite...), and now find that a bunch of the
> >other half are now turning down their PSI peering links. (BTW, has it been
> >established here whether PSI or CW is to blame for this?)
>
--
---------------------------
Christopher A. Woodfield rekoil at semihuman.com
PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B
More information about the NANOG
mailing list