95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?)
Richard A. Steenbergen
ras at e-gerbil.net
Mon Jun 4 21:55:47 UTC 2001
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 10:48:11PM -0400, Jim Mercer wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 01:34:08PM -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> > > most of my customers are ethernet connected, and some customers share
> > > an interface. i got into this before it was cheap to do 802.11q
> > > switching, so my billing system needed to deal with multiple customers
> > > on a single ethernet.
> >
> > Thats irrelevant; look at the counters on the customers switch-port.
> > Doesn't matter what VLAN (or none) they are on.
>
> ah, well, again, i was using multiport bsd implementations, not
> switches.
>
> as it stands, i'm fairly content using the cache flow from the
> cisco's.
>
> one day, i might actually install a full 802.11q compliant switching
> framework, but, well, not today.
Come on, even D-Link is making switches with 802.1q...
http://www.dlink.com/products/switches/des6000/
Go search your couch for loose change.
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
More information about the NANOG
mailing list