engineering --> ddos and flooding
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Mon Jun 4 05:13:23 UTC 2001
At 14:36 01/06/01 -0400, Mark Mentovai wrote:
>Walter Prue wrote:
> >I came up with a solution for networks with ISP connections to deal
> >quickly with DDOS attacks without having to be able to work with a
> >network technician at the ISP for immediate relief. If the ISP agrees,
> >install a second low speed connection to the same router your primary
> >router BGP peers with. Through this low speed connection you run a
> >second bgp session advertising the /32 that is being attacked by the
> >DDOS. You mark the /32 as NO-ADVERTISE so the route doesn't leave the
> >border router.
>
>Or, without adding an extra connection, negotiate a NULLROUTE community with
>your upstream provider. This would be a wonderful addition to the
>well-known BGP communities. I'll bring this up on IDR.
Assuming not adding the extra connection, this means that upstream prefix
filtering, so that one can't mistakenly inject 255 /24s rather than a
single /16, would go out the window. Now think about /32s and what the
routing tables will start to look like. Now consider that the upstream
would also want to send to its upstream Tier-1 the NULLROUTE /32 as well so
that his bandwidth is not eaten up as well and we have a situation whereby
routing table size will triple in size every year.
-Hank
>Mark
More information about the NANOG
mailing list