95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?)

Alex Rubenstein alex at nac.net
Sun Jun 3 04:35:23 UTC 2001




> "samples" to calculate 95th percentile, so a missed sample is equivilent
> to a 0 sample. A rate can be interpolated for the missing time, but it is
> pretty much guaranteed not to be accurate, and I'd suspect a case could be
> made against a provider who "makes up numbers" because of a failure in
> their billing system.

Or, just take the next sample and divide it by 10 minutes, rather than 5,
and count it as two samples in the 95th calculation.






More information about the NANOG mailing list