telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ?

Tue Jul 31 22:10:29 UTC 2001

On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 14:59:25 PDT, Roeland Meyer said:

> You are probably aware, but EFF published the DES crack. I understand that
> it is  now an issue of cracking DES in less than 12 hours. 3DES is better
> but it only amounts to DES with a 128-bit key.

Actually, 3DES has a 112 bit effective key.  However, although that's only
double the key length, the *difficulty* is a bit more than twice as much.
Assuming a brute-force of a 56-bit key in 12 hours, then a 112 bit key
will take (given the same resources) 2**56 * 12 hours, which is about
864,691,128,455,135,232 hours which works out to 98,709,032,928,668 years,
which is about 4,000 times the current estimated age of the universe.

This analysis of course assumes that the EFF crack is a brute-force,
and not a result of differential cryptanalysis or exploitation of a
flaw in the DES S-boxes or similar.  Schneier's 'Applied Cryptography'
lists an attack that's around 2**47 rather than 2**56, assuming you can
get the victim to encrypt several gigabytes of text of your choosing with
his key....
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Operating Systems Analyst
				Virginia Tech

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20010731/6aae5cd7/attachment.sig>