telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ?
Charles Sprickman
spork at inch.com
Tue Jul 31 16:40:52 UTC 2001
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Jared Mauch wrote:
> 5) Use some config versioning system to detect changes
> to configs and archive them. This aides in the "who removed
> X route" stuff. This allows you to audit tacacs.log as well
> as get diffs of the router configs when the change is made.
6) Finding a unix ssh that supports 3DES and DES.
I curse those OpenSSH folks for making me have to trudge through the code
to find out how to get DES working...
6a) Finding a release on CCO that supports 3DES.
Charles
> I'm sure someone could write a BCP or something like that for
> operating a internet connected network as far as securing your
> device(s).
>
> - Jared
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 09:23:58AM -0400, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello All , I have charged myself with trying to find a statistic
> > on how many individuals responsible for IP core equipment
> > recommend telnet or ssh & why particularly . I will summarize .
> > Tia , JimL
> >
> > +------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > | James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
> > | Network Engineer | P.O. Box 854 | Give me Linux |
> > | babydr at baby-dragons.com | Coudersport PA 16915 | only on AXP |
> > +------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> --
> Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
> clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list