telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ?

Charles Sprickman spork at inch.com
Tue Jul 31 16:40:52 UTC 2001


On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Jared Mauch wrote:

> 	5) Use some config versioning system to detect changes
> to configs and archive them.  This aides in the "who removed
> X route" stuff.  This allows you to audit tacacs.log as well
> as get diffs of the router configs when the change is made.

6) Finding a unix ssh that supports 3DES and DES.

I curse those OpenSSH folks for making me have to trudge through the code
to find out how to get DES working...

6a) Finding a release on CCO that supports 3DES.

Charles

> 	I'm sure someone could write a BCP or something like that for
> operating a internet connected network as far as securing your
> device(s).
>
> 	- Jared
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 09:23:58AM -0400, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> >
> >
> > 	Hello All ,  I have charged myself with trying to find a statistic
> > 	on how many individuals responsible for IP core equipment
> > 	recommend telnet or ssh & why particularly .  I will summarize .
> > 		Tia ,  JimL
> >
> >        +------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >        | James   W.   Laferriere | System    Techniques | Give me VMS     |
> >        | Network        Engineer |     P.O. Box 854     |  Give me Linux  |
> >        | babydr at baby-dragons.com | Coudersport PA 16915 |   only  on  AXP |
> >        +------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> --
> Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
> clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list