product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..')
Miles Fidelman
mfidelman at civicnet.org
Wed Jul 25 15:33:08 UTC 2001
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> David Charlap wrote:
> >
> > William Allen Simpson wrote:
> > >
> > > Also, you may have noticed that shrink-wrap licenses are valid in
> > > only two places: Washington (state) and Virginia. This would be a
> > > Federal class action.
> >
> > Didn't the Digital Millennium Copyright Act make shrink-wrap licenses
> > valid nation-wide?
> >
> No.
>
> You are thinking of last year's electronic signatures act -- an act that
> has no signatures, merely "sound, symbol, or process".
You're thinking of UCITA - the proposed revisions to the Universal
Commercial Code. These WOULD make shrink wrap licenses a lot more
powerful and painful.
The good news is that UCITA has to be enacted state-by-state, and an
increasing number of big players (e.g. large, corporate software buyers)
are lining up against UCITA.
**************************************************************************
The Center for Civic Networking PO Box 600618
Miles R. Fidelman, President & Newtonville, MA 02460-0006
Director, Municipal Telecommunications
Strategies Program 617-558-3698 fax: 617-630-8946
mfidelman at civicnet.org http://civic.net/ccn.html
Information Infrastructure: Public Spaces for the 21st Century
Let's Start With: Internet Wall-Plugs Everywhere
Say It Often, Say It Loud: "I Want My Internet!"
**************************************************************************
More information about the NANOG
mailing list