When will 128M not be enough?
andy at tigerteam.net
Sun Jul 15 22:01:43 UTC 2001
On Sun, 15 Jul 2001 jlewis at lewis.org wrote:
> In most cases you don't. What pushed the client I'm thinking of to
> multihome though was the C&W/PSI peering issue and the threat of similar
> issues in the future. They only had connectivity to C&W and needed to
> reach networks only on PSI. Multiple BGP peers and full routes would have
> worked for them in this case. Customer routes and multiple defaults would
> likely not have worked.
Of course there are multiple ways to take customer routes, one of which is
filtering. A unique situation such as the CW/PSI mess would have called
for a prefix filter tweak, which, albeit, not automatic, relatively
painless on a small scale (i.e, you don't have to change hundreds of
customer routers because they don't have the talent themselves).
More information about the NANOG