When will 128M not be enough?
arnold at nipper.de
Sat Jul 14 16:03:18 UTC 2001
up at 3.am schrieb:
> It looks like some recent aggregation has been helping to slow down the
If you look at some figures (e.g.
http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr-report.html) it's even pretty stable
around 101K prefixes.
128M should do if you only have two or three upstreams, soft reconfiguration
disabled and almost nothing else enabled. Does anyone have experience with
zebra/mrt/... as a route server?. I need one and would like to you for the
cheap server based solution instead of having to buy a fully fledged router.
More information about the NANOG