DDoS attacks
Jon Mansey
jon at interpacket.net
Thu Jul 12 17:46:18 UTC 2001
At 11:54 PM -0400 7/11/01, John Fraizer wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Jon O . wrote:
>
>> This is pathetic. Someone asks for help and you demean them with jokes.
>
>Who was joking? I wasn't. I suppose that we should all start posting
>"HELP ME!" posts to NANOG instead of sending an email to/calling the NOC
>of networks with which we are having issues with DIRECTLY.
snip
Have you ever tried emailing or calling the NOC of a Korean NSP for assistance?
We recently ahem, "entertained" a huge (100Kpps +) DDOS from Korean
IPs. Even UUnet couldnt block it. We lost that $30k/m customer.
Anyone have the email address for the KrNOG list :-)
jm
unsnip
>All the
>original poster did was add to the impact of the attack in question. The
>attackers can now say, "Look! We kicked SO MUCH BUTT THAT THEY HAD TO GO
>WHINE ON NANOG! WE RULE!"
>
>> your own network. However, I'm concluding from the type of behavior
>> displayed that most of you manage nothing larger than a couple T-1s.
>
>Think what you like. I'm sure it isn't the first you've been wrong and
>most likely won't be the last.
>
>>
>> There is no solution to this problem.
>
>OK. No solution? If that is the case, why are you wasting your time
>posting about it?
>
>> ...ACT AS YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE TREATED.
>
>If I had posted the message the original poster did, I would have FULLY
>expected to be blasted/flamed/laughed at. What is your point?
>
>>Both of you are in my shitheads for life book and the only way to get out
>>is to apologize to the poster, CC: nanog and ask a good question about
>>the attacks so that we might all learn something.
>
>The last time I checked, direct attacks and the use of foul language were
>both in violation of the NANOG AUP (Item #4). I believe it is YOU who
>owes an apology. [Note: Get him Sue!]
>
>
>---
>John Fraizer
>EnterZone, Inc
More information about the NANOG
mailing list