GRC rides again...
Roeland Meyer
rmeyer at mhsc.com
Mon Jul 2 14:34:34 UTC 2001
That sounds like a very good reason to NOT use QoS.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Israel [mailto:davei at biohazard.demon.digex.net]
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 7:24 AM
> To: Roeland Meyer
> Cc: 'rdobbins at netmore.net'; 'David Howe'; nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: RE: GRC rides again...
>
>
>
>
> I doubt it. In fact, a clever hacker could figure out who has paid
> for what qos, and use it to give attacking traffic high priority.
> It adds another variable; it doesn't present a solution.
>
> On 7/2/2001 at 07:15:08 -0700, Roeland Meyer said:
> >
> > Yes, but my first question was wrt QoS. Would it do any good?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Roland Dobbins [mailto:rdobbins at netmore.net]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 7:12 AM
> > > To: Roeland Meyer
> > > Cc: 'David Howe'; nanog at merit.edu
> > > Subject: Re: GRC rides again...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Implementing fully-compliant sockets in XP is -not- a
> security issue.
> > >
> > > There're LOTS of things wrong with the way Microsoft do
> > > things, but this
> > > simply isn't one of them. It's just amazing to me how
> credulous the
> > > public are when harangued by such an obvious snake-oil salesman.
> > >
> > > Steve Gibson, a hero in his own mind.
> > >
> > > Roeland Meyer wrote:
> > >
> > > >>From: David Howe [mailto:DaveHowe at gmx.co.uk]
> > > >>Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 2:48 AM
> > > >>
> > > >>... With yet another "update" to the DDos pages.
> > > >>http://grc.com/dos/intro.htm
> > > >>and I quote:
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >>>Unfortunately, today we see only the operation of blind
> > > >>>
> > > >>self-interest from
> > > >>
> > > >>>Microsoft and the Internet's ISP's
> > > >>>
> > > >>As I seem to recall several members of this list offered him
> > > >>help (and were rebuffed) perhaps they
> > > >>would like to comment? He seems increasingly lost in
> > > >>a fantasy world where everyone is out to get him....
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > The question I have is, would QoS would do any good here?
> > > >
> > > > Other then that, he seems to be on a rant here. As much as
> > > I hate to say it,
> > > > I almost agree with MSFT here. That said, Novell stated,
> > > decades ago, that
> > > > MSFT never could understand network security. At the time,
> > > I agreed with
> > > > Novell. Current observation is, that MSFT has yet to learn.
> > > Considering
> > > > MSFT's workstation market-share, that is a problem for
> all of us.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Roland Dobbins <mordant at gothik.org> // 408.859.4137 voice
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Dave Israel
> Senior Manager, IP Backbone
> Intermedia Business Internet
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list